Relational Leadership (Part 2)
October 27, 2006
If the Omniscient God, ‘leader’ of the universe, adjusts his decisions based on the relational discourse with man, then shouldn’t we as ‘leaders’, limited and finite, also allow our decisions to be bent through relational discourse with those we lead. With this in mind, how does one approach organizational impasses around decision making. As a leader, do you plough ahead with your convictions despite the relational fallout? Or do we sacrifice what we know is best, for something less out of love and respect for those we lead. A couple Biblical examples are worth noting: Genesis 18:23-25 – Abraham pleads with God to spare the city of Sodom and God listens to Abraham and deals with Sodom not on His own terms but on Abrahams terms. Exodus 32:9-14 – God is wanting to destroy the Israelites and begin again with Moses, but Moses replies :12 – “Turn from your fierce anger; relent and do not bring disaster on your people.” God relents from his decision and bends to the request of Moses. In looking at these Biblical examples it’s important to note that if God is God then he knows all things and His way will always be best. And yet, God, out of relationship, opts for something less than the best because he’s a relationally driven leader. This expression of God is what makes prayer worth our effort. In addition, It shines a light on why we are here: God didn’t create man to accomplish a task but to enjoy a relationship.







